![]() ![]() So there are new fancy features, but they are still buggy, but MS actively developing and try to fix them. If you checking DBCC through listener name inside contained AG then all is fine. So we need to go with traditional availability group in our env then.Īlso there is bug for DBCC check that if you checking on node directly with contained AG then you getting allocation error for contained AG master database. They promised to update also documentation for this. With the current design, SSISDB cannot make use of Contained AG environment. For SSISDB catalog, the internal connection to the database is made via connection name SSISDB instead of the AG listener name. With a basic understanding of what SQL vs NoSQL is, lets take a look at. ![]() The Catalog has not been tested with and does not support Contained Availability Group. database and which type of system can provide that in the most efficient manner. I made MS support case and official answer came that they don’t have made any changes in SSISDB for SQL 2022 and they don’t support SSISDB in contained availability group. ![]() One very important thing is that contained availability group is not supporting SSISDB – that I didn’t found in any official MS documentation and it was surprise for me! We had one pre-prod SQL server with contained availability group and after patching to CU4 (to fix this bug ) I found that SSIS subsystem was completely missing (before with CU3 it existed there). But we have seen also many bugs around there. We have all new SQLs with SQL 2022 (so already many of them already) and some are migrating to 2022. If you were deploying a mission-critical production server in June, which SQL Server version would you pick? Should you do new installations of SQL Server 2022 today? I’m not going to give you the answer, dear reader – instead, I wanna hear your opinion in the comments. Microsoft says they’re working on this issue, but for now, the workaround is to disable Query Store or PSPO, or continuously delete PSPO plans from Query Store yourself. few troubleshoting steps i would do 1.) run procmon to see more details on path ,it is expecting 2.) try attaching a windbg and try starting again 3. The second problem is memory dumps every 15 minutes if you have both Query Store and Parameter-Sensitive Plan Optimization (PSPO) turned on. That means the CU4 documentation might be wrong, and this bug might only apply to indexes with a descending key specified. Update: in the comments, Paul White points out that trace flag 13166 skips a logic step when building query plans, but it only applies to descending index keys. To work around that problem, the CU4 documentation suggests you uninstall CU4 or enable trace flag 13166 and free the plan cache. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |